On Jan 19, 2012, at 10:07 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
I would agree. They've dotted every i and crossed every t here.
This will inevitably be followed by a prosecution of some sort and/or there's also scope for Megaupload to sue the USG for restitution.
It'll be interesting to see how this pans out - especially wrt any safe harbor provisions in the DMCA for providers (which do have a provision for due diligence being exercised etc).
Note this from the NY Times article: The Megaupload case is unusual, said Orin S. Kerr, a law professor at George Washington University, in that federal prosecutors obtained the private e-mails of Megauploadbs operators in an effort to show they were operating in bad faith. "The government hopes to use their private words against them," Mr. Kerr said. "This should scare the owners and operators of similar sites." And see 17 USC 512(c)(1)(A) (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/512.html) for why that's significant. --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE