Tim May wrote:
Some lurker unwilling to comment on the public list sent me this. I didn't notice it wasn't intended for the list until I had already written a reply and was preparing to send it. So I have altered the name.
'Twas meant for the list, I just hit "reply" instead of "reply all" without looking. @lne.com and @minder.net don't set a Reply-To: header, but @einstein.ssz.com does. I don't get any mail from other nodes, if there are any. So some list mail needs a "reply" to get to the list, and some needs a "reply to". Personally I prefer to hit "reply", ie with a Reply-To: header set to the list (confusing, eg!). That way, if I want to reply to the list (which is my default preference) then the sender of the mail I'm replying to doesn't get two copies. But then I use OE... Perhaps @lne.com and @minder.net could do this? Or, if people prefer, @einstein.ssz.com could stop setting the Reply-To: header? Or would having all the nodes do it the same way be too conventional for cypherpunks... -- Peter Fairbrother