On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Tim May wrote:
(I admit to having a perverse side, too. No suprise to many of you. Several years ago I posted some binaries to the brand-new newsgroup, "alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.children". I claimed they were some hot lolitas, though in fact they were misc. PGP noise, with hidden text messages running down some of the diagonals, to get me off the hook if some DA claimed they were real pictures and demanded the decryption key. I wanted to shake things up. Got a lot of outraged responses, too.)
Were they outraged that it was not kiddy porn or outraged that they could not get to it or outraged because you claimed it was kiddy porn? (I tend to direct people to http://www.thecorporation.com/oneoffs/96/kittyporn/index.html for that sort of stuff...) Makes you wonder what they were doing reading that group in the first place... alano@teleport.com | "Those who are without history are doomed to retype it."