Xeni Jardin wrote:
The Reuters story follows, and the HNC corporate press release announcing the project is here:
<http://www.hnc.com/hnc/PressReleases/index.cfm?PressID=112&attributes.f useaction=ShowRelease>
press release excerpt:
<
"By using high-end risk analytics and decisioning engines, we can help airlines, airports and law enforcement agencies identify patterns that warrant further investigation - without intrusive security measures," explained John Mutch, chief executive officer of HNC. "Much of HNC's technology research has been funded over the years by defense and intelligence organizations. We're delighted to put this technology to use to increase traveler safety."
HNC's Critical Action software, which uses anonymous mathematical algorithms that cannot be reverse engineered, identifies patterns in data that would not be noticed using any other method. HNC's technology can scan structured and unstructured data, detect patterns, categorize, prioritize and automatically route information to relevant security agency personnel.>>
--XJ
I'm dubious about the "anonymous mathematical algorithms that cannot be reverse engineered" part, and I'm skeptical about the "we're gonna cork up the mind of God and bottle it for those worthy/rich enough to afford it" aspect. Sounds like snake oil to me. Data mining, pattern-recognition, AI, ubiquitous surveillance, etc. are just tools. The biggest danger, beyond flawed premises in the code, such as, for instance, ignoring second-order and higher observer loop effects, or beyond willful misuse, is GIGO. The central issues are still political, anyway. None of this matters if I'm not bothering you and you come fuck with me, in other words. And, hey, two can play the same game. Thank you, Mr. Felsenstein, et al. Choate, feel free to forward to psychohistory. jbdigirz