At 10:28 1/24/96 -0800, Lucky Green wrote:
I agree. The reason for enforcing ITAR is to keep good crypto of the *domestic* market. If ITAR no longer accomplishes that, new laws will be passed.
I think this is likely to be an oversimplification. While there are probably a number of people in e.g. FBI, DEA, DOJ who want to restrict domestic crypto, I suspect there are also a number of people in e.g. NSA who are sincerly interested in using SIGINT to protect the US from foreign threats and want strong domestic crypto as part of that protection. As always, public policy is a compromise between competing interests (INSIDE the beltway). However, the current policy is a holdover from the days when strong crypto was a closely held trade secret. Since this assumption is no longer true, the policy becomes more and more disfunctional every day. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz Periwinkle -- Computer Consulting (408)356-8506 16345 Englewood Ave. frantz@netcom.com Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA