Timothy C. May wrote:
At 2:10 AM 9/24/96, hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu wrote:
like Markof are somewhat more responsible. This is not going to stop me from producing an op-ed piece linkiing the net libertarians to assasination politics unless I hear a few more repudiations of Bell's ideas. If you don't very clearly reject his murderous ideas you are going to regret it just as the left regreted having the USSR or the RAF associated with them.
I for one don't respond well to extortion threats, so write your damned article.
Seconded. You know, the real problem with the average blackmailer is that they rarely give you the offer as a legal document - if we fulfil our side of the bargain, how can we be sure he fulfils his, and doesn't change his mind next time someone half agrees with a pro AP/Legal-blackmail/Tax-haven/Libertarian-state/freedom-of-speech/whatever post? We obviously need some sort of legal contract to solve this problem, but no, that's not possible in most countries, is it?. How convenient. Till next time Phill ... Gary -- "Of course the US Constitution isn't perfect; but it's a lot better than what we have now." -- Unknown. pub 1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22 Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com> Key fingerprint = 0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D 1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06