-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In list.cypherpunks, shamrock@netcom.com writes:
Let's put the question if something like PICS will be mandated aside for the moment. Do you agree that sites that deliberately mislabel their content, will eventually face legal action? If so, then PICS should not be considered truly voluntary.
A thought: The way you word your question is likely the way any regulation will be worded, to wit "mislabeling the content". I wonder what might happen to sites that deliberately label their content as offensively as possible, even though the content is actually benign. Certainly this is "mislabeling", but you want to bet whether this inversion gets prosecuted? - -- Roy M. Silvernail [ ] roy@scytale.com DNRC Minister Plenipotentiary of All Things Confusing, Software Division PGP Public Key fingerprint = 31 86 EC B9 DB 76 A7 54 13 0B 6A 6B CC 09 18 B6 Key available from pubkey@scytale.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMquiAxvikii9febJAQGzHgP/RQ1aKrc/sUr6YcSI3WUxtJgEMBo7SA48 sY6MF13HcZ12yRNrawp8Dfh5WGAesjCTPiOeNhQSVLNUlShr7U1aEJYFWmFPf9qM HkMkZyEWlrMMRvOTc0AbQD3is7aQT4z0WUDwa8T+psRFc1FZYHmvtgm5Qah2FD+M L8R8GxIoGdw= =CtSM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----