Forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 09:08:11 -0500 From: Soren <sorens@workmail.com> Subject: Re: How to solve the tax problem w/o anarchy or force (fwd)
<P>This also provides an outlet for the social do-gooders to create their utopias by vastly inflating those taxes associated with less favored consumables
Hm, interesting choice of terms for comparison. So you're admitting that anarcho-whatever isn't a social do-gooder, the intent is not to make the system better or more equitable. Rather you're admitting, apparently tacitly, that the goal of the anarcho-whatever is personal rather than social improvement. There is also a further tacit admission with this system won't address the social ills that plague us currently. I must admit I'm impressed. In a couple of days I've run across two seperate anarcho-whatever supporters who admit their proposal won't address the social ills but rather leaves them up to chance. That's more than in the last 20 years.
be heavily taxed, and what not. Perhaps this is why there were multiple states in the US rather than a single homogenous state, prior to Honest (I am not a crook) Abe?
Duh, I believe the boy has it.
<P>Last time I looked at it, there were 108 separate taxes included in the retail cost of an egg and 112 for a loaf of bread, so yes, I would
I'd like a reference to this particular list if possible.
<P>One question for the socialists out there; when is the promised egalitarian utopia going to kick in? It doesn't seem to be getting any closer.</HTML>
I'd ask the same question of the anarcho-whatever but you took care of it so adroitely above... ____________________________________________________________________ Lawyers ask the wrong questions when they don't want the right answers. Scully (X-Files) The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------