30 Nov
2000
30 Nov
'00
5:38 a.m.
obvious@beta.freedom.net wrote:
RAH writes:
...an argument for bearer credentials if there ever was one...
[...snip...]
In fact if anything this kind of prosecution is an argument *against* getting into the ecash/ecredential business, especially if it is focused on porn as some have proposed. All you need is for someone to use it to sell or authorize access to kiddie porn, and you're going to jail.
I'd like to see the cops trying to arrest the Bank of England. Ken