On Wed, 25 Jan 1995 Louis Cypher wrote:
In recent discussions, the consensus was that message reordering was superior to (and the actual intent of) latency. Reordering is not sufficient, a form of latency is required to make it effective.
I have literally hundreds of messages archived from the CP list of several months back where Eric Hughes repeatedly states that reordering, not latency, is the key. Reordering of a sufficient magnitude will introduce latency inherently. Otherwise you are still vulnerable to traffic analysis (which is an art, not a science, remember). -- Michael Handler <grendel@netaxs.com> Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics Philadelphia, PA "Toi qui fais au proscrit ce regard calme et haut" -- Baudelaire * Skotoseme PGP Key ID FC031321 Print: 9B DB 9A B0 1B 0D 56 DA 61 6A 57 AD B2 4C 7B AF