-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I would be almost as inclined to think that a company using PGP5.5 with a forced encrypted to (company) self in addition to whomever else ... might even put up a bigger fuss about passing out their 'master key' to Freeh-dumb et al. than many CP individuals ... ... another passing thought, could the anticipated implementation of this have had anything to do with removal of the 'conventional encryption' options in PGP5 ???? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBNDlREcdZgC62U/gIEQIo/wCg0FfHi8A3a67vYsskAElu5U7C/vkAoLfx 4a/uggNws8ZfGCRNm3UZbo2Q =OGro -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Brian B. Riley --> http://www.macconnect.com/~brianbr For PGP Keys mailto:brianbr@together.net?subject=Get%20PGP%20Key "It's what you learn after you know it all that counts" John Wooden