[I haven't seen this mentioned yet on the list...] Cylink has been kind enough to put a copy of the arbitration panel's decision on their web page. Cylink's home page is www.cylink.com. The URL for the actual agreement is: http://www.cylink.com/arbtrn_1.html Spin doctors aside, it doesn't look like either company gained much over the other. I'm not an attorney, but the way I read the agreement RSAREF can continue to be used without violating the Stanford patents. RSA DSI cannot *sublicense* the Stanford patents to third parties, but can *sell code* that practices the methods claimed in the Stanford patents. That code can then be incorporated into other products, which is exactly what PGP 2.6.2 does (it's linked against a copy of the RSAREF library, which is covered by the RSAREF license agreement). --bal