On Sun, Aug 03, 1997 at 12:29:37PM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
Here's the sequence of events as I see it:
1. spammer spams you with adverisement for phone sex line 2. you try to sue phone sex line company 3. phone sex company denies all knowledge 4. government says all email must be authenticated 5. government issues internet drivers license 6. anonymous remailers work around authentication requirement 7. government outlaws remailers
See any flaws in that logical and undesirable sequence of events?
The flaws become apparent if you try to attach a *realistic* probability to each step. -- Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited", kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke... PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55 http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html