On Thu, 18 Apr 1996, the intrepid anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com FUDded to cypherpunks:
[Congressional Record: April 17, 1996 (Senate)] [Page S3454-S3478]
[fascinating but probably out-of-context remarks from Biden, suggesting that we should all don our tin-foil hats in fear of the FBI rabdar vans, deleted] I cannot find the referenced remarks. Assuming the selection is accurate, it is abundantly clear that Binden continued speaking beyond where you so ominously chose to cut him off. Could you give me a *specific* URL? Or a way to get static page number URLs? I can only figure out how to search http://thomas.loc.gov/ and get temp URLs. I *did* read Biden's *highly entertaining* comments on the contentious Internet Baby Food Bomb Issue, from the conference report mentioned by the redoubtable Mr. Anonymous. Thanks so much for pointing me to this debate; it almost makes still being in my office worthwile. Does anyone know the documents that Senator Biden is quoting? I *must know* how to build The Dreaded Baby-Food Bomb. **I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP. THIS IS YOUR UNITED STATES SENATE AT WORK.**
From the April 17th Congressional Record, what page I unfortunately cant tell you, because Thomas and/or I suck:
Mr. BIDEN. Mr. President, I yield myself such time as I may use within the limit of the time I have. This provision is very straightforward and simple. It is beyond me why it was taken out of the Senate version of the language that was sent to the House. I have heard many colleagues stand up on the floor here and rail against pornography on the Internet, and for good reason. Even when we thought we had corrected the language that Senator Exon introduced to comport with the first amendment, I still hear in my State, and I hear of people writing about how so and so is promoting pornography on the Internet because they will not ban pornography on the Internet. Yet, in the bill, we came along--all of us here--and the genesis of this came from Senator Feinstein, when it was initially offered. The majority leader, Senator Hatch, and I had some concerns with this, and we thought the language to ban teaching people how to make bombs on the Internet or engage in terrorist activities on the Internet might violate the first amendment. Senators Dole, Hatch, and I worked to tighten the language and came up with language that was tough and true to civil liberties. It was accepted by unanimous consent. We have all heard about the bone-chilling information making its way over the Internet, about explicit instructions about how to detonate pipe bombs and even, if you can believe it, baby food bombs. Senator Feinstein quoted an Internet posting that detailed how to build and explode one of these things, which concludes that `If the explosion don't get'em, the glass will. If the glass don't get'em, the nails will.' I would like to give you a couple of illustrations of the kinds of things that come across the Internet. This is one I have in my hand which was downloaded. It said, `Baby food bombs by War Master.' And this is actually downloaded off the Internet. It says: These simple, powerful bombs are not very well known, even though all of the materials can be obtained by anyone (including minors). These things are so-- I will delete a word because it is an obscenity. powerful that they can destroy a CAR. The explosion can actually twist and mangle the frame. They are extremely deadly and can very easily kill you and blow the side of a house out if you mess up while building it. Here is how they work. This is on the Internet now. It says: Go to Sports Authority or Herman's Sport Shop and buy shotgun shells. It is by the hunting section. At the Sports Authority that I go to you can actually buy shotgun shells without a parent or an adult. They don't keep it behind the glass counter, or anything like that. It is $2.96 for 25 shells. And then it says: Now for the hard part. You must cut open the plastic housing of the bullet to get to the sweet nectar that is the gun powder. The place where you can cut is CRUCIAL. It means a difference between it blowing up in your face or not. Then there is a diagram, which is shown as to how to do that on the Internet. Then it says: You must not make the cut directly where the gun powder is, or it will explode. You cut it where the pellets are. And then it goes through this in detail. And then it gets to the end, and it says: Did I mention that this is also highly illegal? Unimportant stuff that is cool to know. And then it rates shotgun shells by two numbers, gauge, pellet size, and goes into great detail. It is like building an erector set. It does it in detail. -rich