-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- At 11:34 AM 3/11/96 -0800, Timothy C. May wrote:
I was more thinking about "novel" applications: things related to digital cash, remailers, information markets, etc. These are things which are at a nascent stage, and nearly any of them can stalled for export by citing the absence of comparable competitors in Europe and Asia.
Hence my concern that the clause is effectively an excuse for delaying crypto for as long as is practically possible. Not much of an improvement over what we have now--though established companies will no doubt be happy because they can export their fairly boring apps--and the new criminalization of crypto (when connected with any of the other thousands of felony-class crimes, such as swearing) is a step backward.
--Tim May
You're exactly correct, here, Tim. (I realize that you may not necessarily welcome an affirmation from me, but you are indeed right about your concerns.) I've chosen to not focus on the export aspects; I'm glad to see you are ably raising them as problems. Jim Bell jimbell@pacifier.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMUSWlfqHVDBboB2dAQE7SgQAo5lk3XrbgH9vUQjukZfKhzKTsE9c0pKb IRj9kzCirfJImb8MhxszevAm/ibGbgZssL2wX4u0osLZiClkwnh12gk39wNMeKuN K3GTHrzuuk6xKH5cseaHXJcCi1CuiL5bj0KQDDsJnMIgvrlQeE2RnmxLKlJH1ngO EO6ASNVSXto= =GepQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----