Do people on this list really believe that the solution to problems is to kill people? Or are we just getting sarcastic and frustrated? (Yes, I know Tim May believes people should be killed, but he's just a fuckhead bag of hot air.) Seems to me that anarchy where people solve their problems by killing people isn't much of a solution to anything. Relying on strong crypto to maintain anonymity so that nobody finds and kills YOU, but you can work to kill public figures, is placing your life in the hands of your crypto. Empower yourself by killing others, or by working to kill them? That sounds pretty lame. -- Greg On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 11:58:52AM +0100, Tom Vogt wrote:
petro wrote:
Oh come now. You have real recourse against Bill Gates and John Tesh
Bill Gates is a questionable case, but there is no doubt that John Tesh should die.
if everyone who hates windos puts $10 in a box, you'd need quite a large box. which makes one wonder why the guy is still alive. or why Linus is still alive, given the fact that M$ could easily pay for the most professional contract killers on the globe. I mean: all of them.
It really is only the mentally disturbed that kill for any reason other than self defense or other *huge* cause.
10 million dollars is, IMO a huge cause.
the only problem I have with this is that it tends to get the figureheads killed. not the biggest assholes, but the somewhat-assholes with a high publicity. instead of learning responsibility, government would most likely cast a couple new protection laws. say, make it illegal to publish a politician's name. "our president has today..."