On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Bill Stewart wrote:
If you don't like the idea that the Supreme's job is interpreting the constitutionality of laws made by the legislature,
Ding ding, somebody got the difference. Though they still don't understand the implications (or which side I'm arguing). That's ok, it will come with time. I have zero, nada, nill, null, none, no problem with the SC interpreting the constitutionality of laws made by the legislature. This is however, different from interpreting the Constitution itself. The Constitution says "....under..." ____________________________________________________________________ Beware gentle knight, there is no greater monster than reason. Miguel de Cervantes The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------