I understand that Tanner asked them (I was out of the room at the time) about whether they heard of FIJA. Nope. -Declan On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:50:03PM -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Jim Burnes wrote:
Were it not for a jury, Tanner could simply pronounce him summarily guilty and be done with it. Not to worry though, its unlikely
Of course, he may "instruct" them to deliver a guilty...
the jury has any concept of their rights.
Rights? Are you kidding?
jim
-- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org
If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place... --------------------------------------------------------------------