On 2012-11-07 11:02 AM, Changaco wrote:
If you believe what I'm "proposing" is impossible in a P2P network, why do you bother answering ?
Because people like you have murdered over a hundred million people like me, and done so with a lordly glow of moral superiority and with the glowing endorsement of the New York Times and Harvard university. Hence that pious smugness disgusts me. It is not the technical details that are off topic, as the piety and moral superiority. If the global "fairness" of a scheme is on topic, then what constitutes global fairness is on topic. Therefore the "fairness" of a scheme should not be on topic. Bitcoin is intended as a more readily transportable substitute for gold, thus the economic history of the gold standard, and the various financial instruments built on top of gold is on topic. Whether gold or those financial instruments oppressed the poor or unduly advantaged the Jews is not on topic. Economic history of gold is on topic, political history of gold is off topic. Economics 101 is on topic. That economics 101 sounds suspiciously reactionary and supposedly oppressed the poor is off topic. _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE