On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
"I think it's important to point out," Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff told me in an interview, "that there's no evidence that this is a program designed to achieve political ends or do something nefarious."
The whole reason that Chertoff "feel(s) it is important to point out" that there is no "nefarious" undertones is because this argument is a deliberate misdirection. It doesn't matter *why* he's breaking the law, what matters is that he IS breaking the law. Either it's legal or it isn't - discussing the motive is irrelevent. Pay no attention to the fascist behind the White House curtain... -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org 0xBD4A95BF 'The right of self defence is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.' St. George Tucker