Let me you way out on a limb, and suggest the following entries, from an infoseek search for the workd PICS, would be unabiguously inappropriate for children.
Pissing, Fisting and beastiality! We go to great lengths to bring you the Good Old Fashioned ALL AMERICAN Pornography, Just Like Dad Used To Watch! Unfortunately, We can't bring you everything! 55% http://adult.mdc.ca/free/xxxp.html (Size 4.3K)
Absolutely the RAUNCHIEST NASTIEST Barely Legal Anal Bitches ANYWHERE!! The ultimate in anal, double anal, double penetration, sloppy oral, and gangbang action!!! 100% GUARANTEED free xrated pics Action!
55% http://adult.mdc.ca/free/xratedp.html (Size 4.5K)
We can clearly come to no agreement here as I cannot see any material listed above which would be harmful in any way to a viewer, child or not.
I don't think I need much justification to suggest that "the ultimate in anal, double anal, double penetration, sloppy oral, and gangbang action" is unsuitable for viewing by "a certain class of people," --- namely children. Do you seriously dispute this? If so, there isn't much point in debating this.
Yes I do seriously dispute this. Can you tell me what in this material is damaging in any way, can you cite examples, can you give causal evidence of damage?
That's what is going on now. Why one would want to encourage this is beyond me. Maybe fighting for the right to show the "ultimate in anal, double anal, double penetration" to children has redeeming value that I don't appreciate.
Then you fail to see the simple point of the redeeming value of true free speech, there are no grey areas, you either believe it or you don`t. Datacomms Technologies data security Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/ Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85 "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"