~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SANDY SANDFORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C'punks, On Tue, 31 Dec 1996, Peter Hendrickson wrote:
At 7:04 AM 12/31/1996, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
There is a simple solution to keeping anonymous posters anonymous under this or any similar scheme. Volunteers could act as "gateways" for anonymous posts. Self-selected list members could announce that they would forward anonymous posts using one of their own tokens for the purpose. (In the alternative, the gateway volunteers could be given extra tokens solely for that purpose.)
Would this expose the posters to liability? Unlike an anonymous remailer, they are deciding what to post.
Probably yes. This is where the gateway volunteer's discretion would come into play. S a n d y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~