1 Jan
2006
1 Jan
'06
9:57 p.m.
On 1/1/06, Tyler Durden
... Yes, agreed, but I think this a MUCH bigger pain in the ass. To wit: If they grab and deencrypt the "message" (ie the piece sent to the receiver) prior to the expiration time, then they will have the message and be able to read it. This is an improvement in that they have to do it prior to the expiration time of the hidden piece. They can not grab and store this piece alone because the other piece will not be there later.
this reminded me of 'cryptoogle' which seems easily compromised but operates using a time delayed expiration of key material as derived from search results: http://www.cryptoogle.com/encrypt.php