Ryan Lackey wrote:
BTW, I don't really like the overly negative names for Eternity, like "inferno", or whatever. I like to think my data is *good* data, deserving of a better fate. Elysium, perhaps? Or just use "eternity" in place of "eternityspace" (a word I never should have used, since it means the same thing), as in "upload these files to eternity", "the collection of files currently stored in eternity", etc. Little danger of confusion with pedestrian meanings of the word eternity, too, I think, and there is no real reason to draw a distinction between eternity the location for documents and eternity the overall system for creating such a space.
How about "perpetuity"? Nice and neutral. "Stored in perpetuity" is a concept everyone understands, too. :-) Cheers, Ben. -- Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686|Apache Group member Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |Apache-SSL author A.L. Digital Ltd, |http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache