17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
At 06:03 AM 2/13/96 GMT, John Lull wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 1996 13:41:04 -0500 (EST), Padgett wrote:
If it were properly and legally decided that communications with anon.penet.fi is against "national interest" then the sovereign has not only the "right" but the *duty* to block/monitor such communications.
Bullpuckey. One could just as legitimately say:
"If it were properly and legally decided that publication of the Los Angeles Times is against "national interest" then the sovereign has not only the "right" but the *duty* to block such publication."
"Right on", as they used to say. Padgett's clueless. He'll try to justify ANYTHING.