After a quick proof read I went and submitted the uncorrected article anyway. [Duh, too many festivities last night]. On Sat, 4 May 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:
Other jurisdictions I would suggest simply for banking secrecy from private plaintiffs would include Vanautu (Though I would note that there is a bit of instability there currently. It seems the locals dislike the english governor a great deal and have begun to sound meanacing about it). While Vanautu has passed a money laundering law, if your application is not otherwise criminal it's still an excellent option.
Vanuatu is the correct spelling.
Ignore almost everything I said above if your expected threat model is anything more than low to moderately determined private plaintiffs (divorce, personal injury, typical small to medium business law suits are all fairly harmless with mere secret banking, but determined attackers with more resources and government attackers have a great deal more resources).
The end should have read: "But determined attackers with more resources and government attackers with immense resources require the use of more intensive efforts and a lot more money." --- My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li "In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti 00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com