Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com> writes:
[...] I don't want it known who is subscribed to lists through SSZ, in short: It isn't any of your damn business and quit asking.
Oh. I guess that explains the blank message I got back from majordomo@ssz.com! I counted that as no one subscribed (or inactive). So I guess the count of cypherpunks subscribers is an underestimate having discounted anyone subscribed through ssz.com. Would you be interested to reveal the number of subscribers for counting purposes? (Not a big deal if you're not).
The only true reliability can be achieved by subscribing to two or more cypherpunks sites, and eliminating duplicates. Reliability has its costs.
As do freedom, privacy, anonymity, etc.
If you have a shell account, you could run an email concentrator (remove duplicates) with procmail, and then down load only the non duplicates. With this setup you could subscribe to all 3 lists and not notice any outages. Adam -- Have *you* exported RSA today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/ print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<> )]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`