17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
In article <199511010235.DAA00908@utopia.hacktic.nl>, Anonymous <anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl> wrote:
The difference, of course, is that its almost impossible to have sympathy for Dr. Fred. His hustle is for a hell of a lot more than subsistence. He was also never actually a master of his field, a fact that becomes increasingly obvious as our exposure to him goes on. Now he's reduced himself to trying to collect someone else's winnings.
So, what part of your analogy was valid? -- Shields.