OKSAS <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu> writes:
On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SANDY SANDFORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C'punks,
On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Anonymous wrote:
This is the stuff Sandy would presumably dump into his "not fit for True Cypherpunks" pile, except that he wrote it, and so is by definition approved.
It was not approved for the moderated list. I sent my comments to the flames list where they belonged. (It went to the unedited list too, but that's fair game as well.) Sorry you didn't understand that.
And I urge our Enlightened Leader to take his own medicine. Stop flaming the list and calling it mere commentary.
So let me see if I've got this, this list should be open to all flamers EXCEPT me? Curious. At any rate, I am going to take anonymous' advice. I will largely refrain from addressing any of the garbage that ends up on the flame and spam lists. You guys are mostly just talking to yourselves anyway.
So how would you define a flame??? Seems more REASONABLE minds want to know????
Oksas, as you see your innocent question was classified as "flame" and dumped into "cyperpunks-flames", as are most questions about the moderator's abuse. Like many homosexuals, Sandy Sandford harbors a pathological hatred of women and is always glad to shut one up. I hope he gets AIDS soon. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps