On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Tim May wrote:
Government has no role whatsoever to play in such actions, which in the U.S., at least, and for the foreseeable future, are supposedly protected by the "freedom of association" language of the Constitution.
First there is no 'freedom of association' in the Constitution. Second, yes, we need government to protect the idividuals rights of expression from people like yourself who would do harm to them if they chose to participate in an act you didn't like (mind you the act wouldn't interfere with your expression or property), simply because you didn't like it. Face it Tim, you're a bigot. ____________________________________________________________________ He is able who thinks he is able. Buddha The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------