Black Unicorn:
The trick is to get the ISP to exist in cyberspace, or ever will it be subject to the whim of the local authority.
This is a key and very important distinction.
I agree. I think this would be a good focus for cypherpunks to think about for awhile. So let me try to start something. A first step is just having a domain name (foo.com) that you can move to different virtual hosts. This is still vulnerable at either the Internic or at your nameservers. Could also be a subdomain of some provider (say foo.c2.org), but then c2.org gets the pressure. So far I don't know of reporters going after the Internic for allowing a name (like foo.com). So this could be safe for awhile. But it is not totally secure. A better method would be to make our own cypherpunk top level domain (I think Sameer talked about this some time back). With this people would either have to setup their nameserver to use one of the cypherpunk nameservers or get the IP address from some other method (a web page, ftpable file, newsgroup, searching AltaVista, or a web page with a cgi script to do the lookup on a machine). But with this there would be no easy way to cut off a name, and the ISP could always relocate if their physical location were cut off (i.e. the IP address had to change). Then it is just an issue of coordinating this top level domain. Say a public key for each new subdomain and updates are done by sending a pgp signed message to each of the servers. With this type of design you could have hundreds or thousands of servers that each were updated independently. To shut it down would take shutting down a lot of nameservers. What do people think? -- Vince ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Vincent Cate vince@offshore.com.ai http://www.offshore.com.ai/vince/ Offshore Information Services http://www.offshore.com.ai/