Thank you for posting these John. I am about 1/2 way through them, and I am struck by how crude the "computer forensic" examinations are (see part 2, around page 270). The government examiners seem to have very little understanding how a computer actually works, but instead, rely on "out box" and "in box" and O/S time stamps, etc. There seems to be no understanding by Leen either, and I would have thought Bell would be trying to make him understand while this persecution was progressing. Since when is an examination a thourough one without a sector by sector and bit by bit combing? And since when has an O/S time stamp become trustworthy? While it is obvious from the transcripts that Tanner was more than a little biased in favor of the prosecution, it sure looks like Bell did his fair share to insure a conviction.