<Infomation provided does not imply expression of a political opinion> <Infomation provided does not imply expression of a political opinion> <Infomation provided does not imply expression of a political opinion> That means you would have to take your CAPI implementation and documentation of it, and distribute it freely in some form (source?) presumably on the 'net. Which could be a violation of the terms you get the signature under. <Infomation provided does not imply expression of a political opinion> <Infomation provided does not imply expression of a political opinion> <Infomation provided does not imply expression of a political opinion> <Infomation provided does not imply expression of a political opinion> Gary Howland wrote:
Ian Goldberg wrote:
I remember hearing (if my memory is correct, from the mouth of a Microsoft employee at Crypto '96) that when Microsoft signs a module, they are certifying that they saw a signed sheet of paper swearing that either (1) you won't export the software, or (2) you have received an appropriate export license.
AFAIK, they don't even read the code.
Really? This implies they would have no objections to signing freely available code, which as we all know will eventually make its way overseas (indeed, it may have originated there).
Gary -- "Of course the US Constitution isn't perfect; but it's a lot better than what we have now." -- Unknown.