Bruce Schneier wrote:
At 02:28 PM 9/22/98 +0100, Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
Bruce Schneier wrote:
At 02:20 PM 9/22/98 +0100, Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
If the 'mathematical magic' is not to be kept secret (as in principle shouldn't for all crypto algorithms) then presumably one could attack through brute forcing the 'remembered secrect', I guess.
Yes, but only through an on-line protocol. And if the server has some kind of "turn the user off after ten bad password guesses," then the atack doesn't work.
I remember someone wrote of the case where the attacker got the file with the millions of passwords. Then if he also knows the 'mathematical magic' he could presumably do offline work. So I suppose that the 'mathematical magic' has to be kept secret, which would work against the generally accepted crypto principles.
No. The online protocol can be public. Nothing has to be kept secret in order for this to work. That would be stupid; we all know that.
I suppose you misunderstood me. I mean the 'mathematical magic' cannot be made public. (Or is 'online protocol' = 'mathematical magic'?) If the 'magic' is public then the attacker with the pool of passwords could brute force offline. M. K. Shen