[etc.]
What do we do about a population which thinks a 4-digit PIN is secure?
[etc.]
Fact is, most people never think about real security.
Safe manufacturers have said that improvements in safes (the metal kind) were driven by insurance rates. A direct incentive to spend more
[etc.] Speaking of safes and the psychology of passwords.... A very funny (and scientifically interesting) book is: _Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman_ One of its chapters (entitled "Safecracker" if my memory serves) discusses the locking file cabinets and safes used by the scientists working on the Manhattan Project (_big_ bomb). Richard P. Feynman took great joy picking, cracking and otherwise bypassing these security measures. He got no end of joy guessing passwords (combinations) based on the personality of the safe owner. The first digits of pi and e were common.... One very high military muckety-muck spent a great deal of money for a walk-in safe with very thick, hardened steel walls. (Since the importance of secrets is obviously proportional to rank!) The high muckety-muck never took the time to change the default combination.... The math is easy; its the cultural side of crypto that tough! Cort. P.S. There is a compact disk recording available of the late Mr. Feynman actually telling this story (along with some of his famous bongo music). It is a treasure if you are interested in that sort of thing. I don't have the address of the publisher, but it can be found somewhere in the second biography of RPF. (Something like, _You Can Think for Yourself_...????)