-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Alex Strasheim <alex@omaha.com> writes:
I think it's a bad idea to require signatures on the list, or even to penalize people who don't use them. People aren't signing their posts because it's too much of a hassle to do it from a dial up, netcom style, account, not because they're insufficiently committed to the cause.
It seems to me that such a rule would stifle discussion and encourage people to store their keys on insecure accounts.
Just create a special key for your netcom account. Use no pass phrase; using one would give a misleading sense of security IMO. Just pass your mail through "pgp -saft" or equivalent and you've got it. It is easy to do this from most editors. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQBVAwUBLttXrxnMLJtOy9MBAQHPNgIAu42vPelscZqT7yQkY08NtOw6XGdNciXI WBVXvgRsRdzIoH7GPbHUIPBVXbPNuZ6zDYzbazmSr+Z2tErY9qTHBw== =wqC5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----