Bill Stewart wrote:
No, it's *not* Prisoner's Dilemma.
Think more literally here. The prisoners are the entire population of accused persons. If all the accused (in all cases in the Injustice System) were to reject plea bargaining and insist on a jury trial, then prosecutors would be spread more thin, and would not be able to extort confessions as they do now.
Most people they try are either guilty of something, and the real issue is exactly how many counts of what they're guilty of and how much they ought to be punished.
Do you have any evidence at all for this assertion? It seems to me that you've been taken in by Big Brother's propaganda. On a regular basis I hear about corrupt judges who act as a second prosecutor, and actively prevent the accused from presenting any effective defense by disallowing crucial evidence and even telling them what arguments they can make. Too often, the prosecution just needs to convict somebody to keep their numbers high, or police need to make arrests because they've allocated a certain portion of the departmental budget to come from forfeitures.