On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, James B. DiGriz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
----- Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> -----
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> Subject: FC: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet porn report To: politech@politechbot.com Cc: HLin@nas.edu Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:37:21 -0400 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 X-URL: Politech is at http://www.politechbot.com/
Background from Politech archives:
"Net-sex NRC panel asks for testimony, will hold regional mtgs" http://www.politechbot.com/p-01852.html
"Patricia Nell Warren's comments to NAS porn panel" http://www.politechbot.com/p-01615.html
"National Academy of Sciences panel hears about porn & kids" http://www.politechbot.com/p-01571.html
"Free speech advocates fret about NAS Net-porn commission" http://www.politechbot.com/p-01567.html
This is science???
What I want to know is: what color should the pantaloons on the piano legs be?
jbdigriz
Let me elaborate: Panels, meetings, testimony...where's the research? What is even being studied here? This sounds like a "problem" fumbling around until it reaches a critical consensus of definition. The opportunities for shenanigans, for good or ill, should be evident. Personally, I was a horny little fucker as a kid. I won't say when exactly, but the the lurid pulp covers at my eye level at the time tended to focus on Ilsa the she-bitch of the SS S&M type themes. I DID find this somewhat disturbing, if fascinating. It was not till sometime later that a friend and I discovered his father's Playboy collection (my old man kept his stash a lot better hidden) and I was exposed to more gratifyingly wholesome images. I can't say that any of it did me any harm, though. Anecdotal, to be sure, but it tallies with my observations of children in recent years, whether watching cable, surfing, or whatever. I know there are folks who won't abide it, but they will be better served by Consumer Reports. And so I've said my say, jbdigriz