Hughes: U> But source code is not available. The trouble is that all U> the decent terminal programs for PC's are shareware or U> commercial (or were originally shareware and have become U> commercial). I too would like to know of any U> source-available PC terminal programs, but I suspect there U> are none because of the prevailing shareware culture. U> I'll give you all of my Fido/FidoNet and FidoTerm sources. You can already have ReadMail. U> communications programs use FOSSIL drivers, but many (if U> not most) terminal programs don't support it. Commercial people still sneer at amateur systems like FidoNet. Their loss. FOSSIL is widely supported otherwise. FidoTerm and Fido/FidoNet both support FOSSIL, as do "all" FidoNet programs. U> One incentive would be for the BBS operators to phase in a U> policy that they will accept no e-mail which is _not_ U> encrypted. Comments? SHEESH!@+#)(#$ You oughta see what most sysops think. It's embarrassing. In their defense, NO ONE WILL TELL US what is reasonable. I know, I know how much is presently undefined and without precedent, but the broadest general parameters and guidelines are not that obscure. I'm also part of the BBSLAW mailing list (out of EFF) and it's finally contained some applicable stuff. What you wanna bet the lawscum won't let me repeat in any manner the recent thread on email? (Yes I'm asking.) (Most sysops are terrified that an in-transit, third-party message will contain some illegality and they will all be BUSTED. Hence, it is routine for them to review personally every in-transit message, and kill or bounce them! I am not kidding. (I know this must have been dealt with in the Internet (is kumr/cygnus/etc liable when I tell you that RICHARD NIXONS VISA CARD NUMBER is 4131 34534 456456 456546?) but somehow, no one's ever passed this info on to us.) --- ReadMail * Origin: World Power Systems / FidoNews / San Francisco CA (1:125/111) -- Tom Jennings - via FidoNet node 1:125/555 UUCP: ...!uunet!hoptoad!kumr!fidogate!111!Tom.Jennings INTERNET: Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG rom fidogate!f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG!tom.jennings@kumr.lns.com Thu Oct 22 11:19:49 1992 Return-Path: <fidogate!f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG!tom.jennings@kumr.lns.com> Received: from kumr.lns.com by toad.com id AA22497; Thu, 22 Oct 92 11:19:49 PDT Received: by kumr.lns.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.3) id <m0mi78E-0000hbC@kumr.lns.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 92 11:19 PDT Received: by fidogate.FIDONET.ORG (mailout1.26); Thu, 22 Oct 92 11:15:22 PDT Date: Thu, 22 Oct 92 11:03:26 PDT Message-Id: <3229.2AE6EFB9@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG> From: tom.jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (tom jennings) Subject: thread (was Re: A To: cypherpunks@toad.com X-Mailer: mailout v1.26 released Just a slightly amusing message forwarded from PUBLIC_KEYS... From: Wes Cowley@1:125/180 To: Wes Perkhiser@1:125/111 Subject: Loss of thread (was Re: A ;Status: (read 2 times) ;^AINTL 1:125/111 1:125/180 ;^APID ReadMail ;^AMSGID RM1:125/111=2AE68513
----------------------- Do not change this line -----------------------------< WP>>"Hi, how are you, and what's your key?" WP>>P.S. Will that be a new pick-up line? It beats "What's your sign?"
"Do you want to swap keys, or just come up to my pad, one time?" * OLX 2.1 TD * The computing field is always in need of new cliches. --- DCI/Chauncy 0.7 * Origin: Bird Lake - (813)265-3256 (1:377/14.0) SEEN-BY: 100/520 102/890 105/36 125/111 125 180 185 135/71 340 163/438 170/109 SEEN-BY: 216/21 234/1 253/513 261/1136 285/27 312/2 374/14 26 48 98 377/3 14 15 SEEN-BY: 377/33 37 396/1 2200/101 ;; -- tom jennings - via FidoNet node 1:125/555 UUCP: ...!uunet!hoptoad!kumr!fidogate!111!tom.jennings INTERNET: tom.jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG