17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
At 11:18 AM 1/10/98 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
I have received some negative feedback about the name "Crypto Kong". Two people have complained that it is unprofessional sounding.
Keep it. If you're going for the liberal non-techie market, it's good; if you're going for the financial market it's still ok, and if you need to, you can publish a standard for it, and some small Nevada corporation with a boring name can distribute a Crypto-Kong-compatible product with a boring name for you :-) Thanks! Bill Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639