At 9:37 PM -0500 9/8/98, Tim May wrote:
I suppose I agree with Eric's earlier point (snipped above) that mentioning the actual names of judges or FBI agents or IRS inspectors in rants about AP and AP bots is not a wise move. As with Bell's stuff, it makes for a case that _possibly_ these agents and judges had something to fear. Were I one of those judges or agents, I would tend to think that _possibly_ my life was in danger.
One could point out that WE have reason to beleive that our lives and freedoms are in danger.
Best to leave rants at the general, protected speech level, and to not get into specifics of names and working habits of agents.
That, and don't plant bombs that don't go off.
But Toto will probably make a plea, as Bell did.
He may be nuts enough not to. petro@playboy.com----for work related issues. I don't speak for Playboy. petro@bounty.org-----for everthing else. They wouldn't like that. They REALLY Economic speech IS political speech. wouldn't like that.