Re: AP is *not* the point

Um, he's not *advocating*. He pointed out that such systems were inevitable.

So he is new Galileo then. Shattering the geocentrism endangered only the theological dogma, and he almost got barbecued. The church in question admitted wrongdoing 350 years after Galileo's death (in 1992). The mere intensity of state's handling of Jim Bell suggests that there is something genuine about AP, but what it is still escapes me. On another hand, maybe I would doubt Galileo as well. Cypherpunk Movement Secretary ps. I want to remind everyone not to miss the secret meeting in Washington, DC, on April 13, 8 pm, at Pedro's. (this message is intended only for Cypherpunk members)