Interesting (if a bit mild for this list) article from another list some of you might be interested in (or already subscribed to).... ---- Forwarded Message ---- From: owner-digitaliberty@phantom.com Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 01:00:06 -0500 To: digitaliberty-digest@piltdown.phantom.com Subject: digitaliberty V1 #13 digitaliberty Tuesday, 31 October 1995 Volume 01 : Number 013 In this issue: Test Electronic Warfare See the end of the digest for information on subscribing to the Digitaliberty or Digitaliberty-Digest mailing lists. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Bill Frezza (via RadioMail) <frezza@radiomail.net> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 13:14:58 -0800 Subject: Test This is a test. <sigh> ------------------------------ From: DigitaLib@aol.com Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 18:02:17 -0500 Subject: Electronic Warfare Folks, Attached is a column that ran on the op-ed page of today's Communications Week. I have agreed to do bi-weekly opinion pieces for them focussing on the impact of technology on society, politics, and culture - all with a DigitaLibertarian slant (of course). My hope is that this fiesty group can keep me fed with grist for these pieces. For anyone that lives in NYC, I will be carrying the DigitaLiberty banner on a panel on digital commerce at the Multimedia Design conference at the Javits center Friday 11/3 at 3:30pm. Stop by and say hello. Regards, Bill - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTRONIC WARFARE WAGES ON - AND YOU'RE THE TARGET Although the flap over the Clinton administration's attempt to promote escrowed-key encryption systems like Clipper has temporarily faded, the war on electronic privacy continues. As proceedings at the Fourth International Conference on Money Laundering, Forfeiture, Asset Recovery, Offshore Investments, the Pacific Rim, and International Financial Crimes reveal, there has been no let up in our government's efforts to blockade the cyber-frontier. No, you won't learn much from the Wall Street Journal or the New York Times, written by journalist-generalists who have no clue about where this technology is heading. The Feds have become so skilled at manipulating the Old Media that stories about electronic privacy invariably center on the latest drug kingpin, pedophile, or domestic terrorist. Attacking these universally abhorred enemies of the people not only makes for good headlines but keeps privacy advocates off balance as they are forced to defend abstract rights using loathsome examples. But if you tune in to the Cypherpunks mailing list (majordomo@toad.com) you can get some excellent first hand reports from the front. In the relatively short period since the passage of the Bank Secrecy Act, which, among other things, obliges banks to file Suspicious Activity Reports on its customers, banks have become virtual deputies in the treasury department's war on uncontrolled financial transactions. And this war is increasingly spilling into cyberspace. The conference underscored the fact that, paradoxically, we are heading not toward more specific and well defined transaction monitoring regulations, but less. How so? The problem with making regulations precise is that what software algorithms can define, other algorithms can evade. Instead, regulation by "raised eyebrow" is becoming the norm. Federal bank examiners have been given significant latitude to invoke draconian penalties against uncooperative banks. Because bank officers have few due-process protections under this regime, it is no surprise that most of them have become sniveling toadies. The objective is to insure that banks "voluntarily" introduce even more aggressive, unpredictable, and intrusive monitoring than the government would ever dare mandate. And to make sure nothing slips through the cracks, human surveillance will be supplemented with artificial-intelligence agents that can perform pattern analysis on the aggregate flow of electronic transactions, flagging anything remotely suspicious. George Orwell would be impressed. Lest you think that all of this is motivated solely by the drug war, a visit to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) homepage (http://www.ustreas.gov/treasury/bureaus/fincen/facts.html) should open your eyes. This battle is not just about drug prohibition, a crime the Treasury Department would have to invent if it didn't already exist. The real struggle is about the future of tax compliance, and it has you in its sights. A famous Revolutionary War era pamphleteer, writing under the pseudonym "Brutus", perhaps said it best 200 years ago when he wrote - "The national government through its taxing power will introduce itself into every corner of the city and country. It will take cognizance of the professional man in his office or his study; it will watch the merchant in his store; it will follow the mechanic to his shop and his work, and will haunt him in his family and his bed; it will be the constant companion to the industrious farmer in his labour; it will penetrate into the most obscure cottage; and finally it will light upon the head of every person in the United States. To all these different classes of people and in all these circumstances on which it will attend them, the language in which it will address them will be GIVE! GIVE!" What Brutus didn't know and what the cypherpunks foresee is that one day strong encryption will make it impossible to spy on our activities in cyberspace. Heightened conflict is inevitable. Expect the rhetoric to get a lot hotter as the government spinmeisters labor to keep us focused on public enemies while frantically trying to keep its hand in every citizens pocket and its eyes on every bankbook. # # # COPYRIGHT CMP PUBLICATIONS 1995 Bill Frezza is president at Wireless Computing Associates and co-founder of the online forum DigitaLiberty. The opinions expresses are his own. Frezza can be reached at frezza@interramp.com. ------------------------------ End of digitaliberty V1 #13 *************************** To subscribe to Digitaliberty-Digest, send the command: subscribe digitaliberty-digest in the body of a message to "Majordomo@phantom.COM". If you want to subscribe something other than the account the mail is coming from, such as a local redistribution list, then append that address to the "subscribe" command; for example, to subscribe "local-digitaliberty": subscribe digitaliberty-digest local-digitaliberty@your.domain.net A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to subscribe to that instead, replace all instances of "digitaliberty-digest" in the commands above with "digitaliberty". ---- End Forwarded Message ----