jbugden@smtplink.alis.ca wrote:
As is the observable phenomenon that some people focus on the details and miss the point. You may also consider this to be a moral judgement.
I'm sorry, but this thread is making no sense. You wondered aloud why Tim would make moral judgements; I claim he didn't. What exactly was it you were trying to say?
To argue that the cited examples - out of the universe of possible examples -
- that you clearly have in stock as ready-to-use straw men -
did not imply a moral judgement is an argument useful only for its humour.
So you're saying that you made a response to Tim questioning his use of moral judgements just to introduce your own moral judgement? If you want to issue moral pronouncements ex cathedra, why not just start a new thread instead of couching them in a confusing response? ______c_____________________________________________________________________ Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX * For the time being, m5@tivoli.com * m101@io.com * <URL:http://www.io.com/~m101> * three heads and eight arms.