Re: "Cypherpunks"

Riad Whaby wrote...

Don't see why you'd do it, but it does seem nifty.

I'm not convinced it's particularly useful, but I like the idea of a list that is by default anonymous. One thing it might do is actually disguise any anonymous remailer usage...ie, MwGs can't even determine who's trying to be anonymous. There might be some other things it gives you as well... -TD