17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
At 09:17 PM 1/12/95 -0600, Larry E wrote:
... (1) the people who use the remailer, who get a measure of comfort from knowing their communication is secure
They know it's secure because they made it secure. If they don't care, I don't particularly see why the remailer should care.
(2) legal groups etc. who may try to hold the remailer liable in some way for what passes through their remailer.
It strikes me that this is a very weak defense. Legal beagles will probably argue that the remailer should have either prohibited encrypted communications or else was in collusion with the sending party. --Paul J. Ste. Marie pstemari@well.sf.ca.us, pstemari@erinet.com