![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a57e37ac90cde6088c9d7e9b99436994.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com> writes:
It also creates a valuable soft-target traffic analysis database; unlike current sendmail logs, it'll probably stick around for an extended period of time, and be readily subpoenaed.
I think I figured out a solution to this nasty problem prompted by Robert Costner's comments: How about this alternative which achieves the same functionality and removes the juicy supeona target: Turn on hashash database for all mails. That means hashcash gets put in the database to prevent double spending. (If we don't do this spammers will club together and do one mega-spam reusing the same hashcash they generated with their spam fest motivated CPU farm and hit you with spam from many addresses, or all forged as from the same address or whatever). So now when you reply to a message, on it's way out via the mail hub, mark the hashcash token as reusable. This means that the sender can cache sent hashcash tokens, and re-use them when after he gets a reply. Adam -- Now officially an EAR violation... Have *you* exported RSA today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/ print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<> )]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`