And don't forget, if you haven't already - to read Rappoport's interview with an ex-juror from the OKC Bombing case, on my website (url below.) Lisa Pease ==================================================================== One person, one vote. Not one dollar, one vote. End private government. Ban corporate donations. Check out the Real History Archives http://www.webcom.com/lpease Read Contemporary Real History at http://www.webcom.com/ctka On Wed, 17 Apr 1996 ssalgaller@CCGATE.HAC.COM wrote:
Suggested Reading:
Oklahoma City - The Suppressed Truth By Jon Rappoport Blue Ocean Press 2633 Lincoln Blvd., Suite #256 Santa Monica, CA 90405 (213) 243-9005 copyright 1995 $12 (post paid)
At 9:02 AM on April 19, 1995, the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City was damaged in an explosion that also left 168 dead and 600 injured. If you look closer at this case, as investigative reporter Jon Rappoport has, you start asking some questions about the "official' story:
The damage was supposedly caused when thousands of pounds of a fuel oil and fertilizer mixture was ignited in a truck parked near the building. Talk about "oil and water never mixing". This mixture would have to be either stirred or mixed just before use. It would also have to be detonated without any air spaces, such as the gaps between the fuel drums, in order to work.
Even if the mixture detonated, it should leave traces of oil. none was found.
Even if it detonated perfectly, the explosion was 3 times too weak to damage the building's reinforced concrete support columns.
Especially column "B3". This column was sheared off at the 3rd floor level. Only a shaped charge placed directly on the column at that level would be able to cause this to happen. That section of the column was cut out and removed as evidence. Will we ever see it again at the trial ?
Local seismometers noted *two* explosions, 10 seconds apart. This was "explained away" as reflections of the explosion by underlying rock strata. Ask a geologist if this sort of time delay has ever been observed before you decide if someone is "underlying".
What ever happened to "John Doe #2", seen with Tim Mc Veigh that morning ?
What happened to John Doe's #3 and #4, seen leaving the area soon after the explosion?
Speaking of Tim, why (if the official story is true) did he advise the officer who stopped him that he had a concealed weapon ? Supposedly, he just killed 168 people, including 19 children. What's one more if it means he could get away ?
And what about Terry Nichols ? He was advocating killing Federal employees at a public meeting in Estes, CO a year before the bombing. The FBI is very efficient, yet no one seems to have paid any attention to Terry to prevent loss of life.
What about the reported financial links to the bombing, not from right wing causes, but from the Brittish Government ?
Finally, what happens if and when the truth comes out in open court at Tim and Terry's trial ? One could guess that the real suppressed story will be one more casualty of the bombing.
Unless we demand that someone explains column "B3".
It *can* happen here - and it *did* a year ago !
Book "review" by Stephen S. salgaller@aol.com