Re: Commerce Department encryption rules declared unconstitutional

Declan wrote:

I think that's about right. One of the important questions was how broadly Patel would rule, whether her ruling would apply just to Bernstein & associates or whether she would enjoin the government from enforcing ITAR/EAR at all.

Unfortunately, she chose the former. But look on the bright side: her narrow decision may be less likely to be reversed, no?

Does this not shift now to Peter Junger's suit: same issues, broader challenge, same opposing arguments? Did Patel rule narrowly in Bernstein to set the stage for the broader case in the works? BTW, is there a suit being readied to follow Peter's? Karn II? PRZ 6.0? What say, Peter, Lee, Cindy, Phil, Phil, Anthony et al?