I suggested a scenario in which:
use of "conspicuous" digital signatures is legal
Monty Harder writes:
Ah. No big deal then. After stegoing, you sign the GIF.
Yes, that was exactly the point I made in my previous message.
But I am having a real problem with an overt policy of fiddling with people's mail. If they did that, it would likely cause a huge backlash that would be felt at the ballot box.
I'm not so sure. (Yes, I'm very cynical about humans -- more than most people on the list, I think.) Everybody and her sister has been bombarding the firewalls list lately, asking about virus scanners and such. IMHO a *lot* of folks would be quite content to have somebody filter their mail "for viruses, harassment, etc." I hope I'm wrong.... -Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>